Nnonnth

Good god, what a miserable bunch of no-hope pathetic losers most people are. NN

Heya Michael –

Many many thanks for your detailed answer. I won’t reply in as much detail… you hit many nails on their heads. I will say: if you think I as a magician of the artistic brand could EVER devalue the possibilities of the present moment, the wavecrest of now, and its inherent potential to make a NEW thing, you are very much…[Read more]

>>And today I work with many clients taking/took drugs and having problems to keep their feet on the ground, having big problems<>In honesty I don’t use drugs because once taken in I have no control about it<<

Yes I understand. I heard that a yogi once took LSD with no effect – just was aware of what it was doing and neutralised it. But I would…[Read more]

>>I don’t want to interrupt your intelligent conversation.<>From my experiences I know that this ‘communication’ has many angles and forms, some we are able to recognize in sounds, images or feelings, some are so way-out that we don’t understand the message in our mind/mental but we ‘feel’ that there is ‘interaction'<>So I decided at that point to…[Read more]

Many thanks for continuing this! We seem to be actually getting somewhere, but I have probably written too much again.

>>please dont take what I say so seriously, words are clumsy, blunt tools, and often cause misinterpretations, especially in written form.<>A magician may use kaballah and the tree of life as a map to follow to get to…[Read more]

>>>>I think we are fundamentally agreed apart from the way we like to phrase it.<<

I'm not so sure… <>This also explains why you are *not* the universe, because the universe is far greater in mass, size and any other measurment than your body.<>By viewing the world through your bodymind you are subjecting the limits of your bodymind on the…[Read more]

I think we are fundamentally agreed apart from the way we like to phrase it, but just to make sure –

>>by *naming* yin and yang you are implicitly creating a language<>the universe itself is not necessarily ‘made out of language’ in fact there is no way of knowing what it’s made out of unless you are the universe.<>everyone’s had an experience…[Read more]

Hey again ff –

Have to disagree with some of that – respectfully…

‘Continuous nowness’ refers to the concept of time but not to its passage.

>>It’s not *only* the linguistic structure at ‘fault’ here – because that comes about from living in a body<>You cant inhabit the ‘androgynous’, or undefrentiated or primordial universe with a…[Read more]

>>Why do you mean that the victims have even less self-respect than she has?<<

When someone is 'draining someone else of chi' in a deliberate manner and giving nothing in exchange, they are sucking the very *soul-life* out of them! Impossible for the 'victim' not to be aware of it on some level if it's really harmful. You might not know the…[Read more]

– Michael’s post below, on ‘using women for immortality’ is answering the same question. When he says ‘practice fusion before sacred sex to avoid this’, he is using his lingo and what he means I think is – know who you are what you want before doing it to avoid such embarassments as ’emotional damage’.

NN

>>Or do you prefer the wimpy feedings by mortals…<<

Exactly. NN

Interesting…

So here – when you say: >>Maybe Michael is saying ‘lived’ because they don’t have/need a ‘body’ any longer.<>The trap is our ego, how tempting it is to name yourself a new Messiah (look at Michaels post about yoniverse).<<

Well why not, if you think it's fun? See how many people believe you. No-one with much in the way of…[Read more]

>>In my opinion humankind is female in essence, we receive life, we are touched by the divine sparkle<>No feministic opposition, no religion to ‘guide’ us, men and women together have the key.<<

… I don't think any sensible person would object… except to say that opposition IS necessary – or there can be no reconciliation. And on it…[Read more]

Bear it’s you who are jaded. NN

Heya Dragon –

You wrote: >>But insn’t it so, I think I have red it in the “cultivating female energy book” by Chia, that if women use their sexual powers on men not cultivated in this practises they hirt the men physicaly but they also hurt themselves emotionally. So I think this is an issue for Women using their sexual powers!<<

Of course…[Read more]

Heya Dragon –

You wrote: <>

Of course it’s true. My point of view (BTW I know little of Taoism and follow none of it so I shouldn’t be here really) is simply, as the Spanish Proverb has it – “Take what you want – and pay for it”.

If a woman did this her whole life, at the end of her life the only reason she wouldn’t be continuously crying…[Read more]

I agree with our cold dragon – it is about power. Also power is still based on sex though, so it is not that simple. As far as whether the methods are ‘evil’ or not – my perspective would be, do as ye will. NN

Heya Rex –

>>Sorry NN hope my reply didn’t come across as getting on your case<<

No, no please of course not. I mean your post was extremely interesting but… I think the truth is I don't know what we are talking about and I've suddenly realised I don't really care! So I will let everyone else fight it out on this one. Thanks,…

Heya Rex –

>>In the absence of direct experience all metaphysical assumptions are unprovable matters of faith<<

Of course they are! I thought the whole point here was that this board is precisely about *obtaining* that direct experience.

I can't think of anything else to say, so I will shut up. best NN

Heya Rex –

>>I don’t think all card carrying buddhists hold to this. Others teach that we are born through ignorance.<<

I can't understand what's going on! This is just as ludicrous as believing we are born from past sins! Whatever next? NN