Home › Forum Online Discussion › General › Cancer and practice
- This topic has 36 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by atxryan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 20, 2009 at 8:05 pm #31483
I havn’t found anything Paolina said a bit interesting and I certainly wouldn’t pay anyone for the what she says or especially the way she said it. I know better to give my e-mail out. The e-mail I gave her is one I reserve for people or businesses I am unsure about. I gave the e-mail out in hopes of talking things out but this so called force of nature just sent gay porn from fake addresses.He talks tuff on here but was all man on man sex in her e-mails. I do truely hope to meet Paolina one day but not to pay her for her so called wisdom. As far as being enriched I feel like berating, making violent threats, being homophobic, rascist, and misogynistic is in no way enriching, just offensive. I simply don’t see anything coming out of fighting on line with her. Her style is to just blurt out a bunch of violent imagery usualy having to do with some deep desire of Paoliona’s, then she says how great she is and how dumb everyone else is, nothing will come of that and it will go on and on with out end. I do hope the great Tao will allow our paths to cross one day. Of that I would be forever greatful.
May 25, 2009 at 9:10 am #314851) your right
2) paolino isn’t a woman.
3) spelling has no reflexion on fighting skills.
May 25, 2009 at 9:29 am #31487Hey paolina, speaking of pipe dreams I sent some freinds in Hollywood to your supposed boxing gym to scope you out and ask around about you, and surprise surprise not one person in that gym has ever heard of Ronnie the Sicilian. I then called the gym on three seperate occasions and talked to three different people and each one said that no one by that name has ever trained there. They also weren’t too happy that you had involved them and their gym in a conflict. So what aspect of you is not a total fucking lie? Now I am absolutely positive that you are nothing but a loud mouth shit talking coward, and will never be man enough to back up anything you say. I know that you will answer this message in a stream of insults and obsenities that sound as if they are coming from a mongaloid pirate, but I now know they are like farts from a diseased asshole. They may stink and they may be noxious but they can do no real harm and will eventually disperse and float away. There is no substance thus no real threat. Just a stench to be waved away.
May 27, 2009 at 4:40 am #314891.
blindif one practices what one’s master has told him to
the if such subject gets hurt,
it is the master that is at loss
for he has just lost an asset.2.
certaintyif one is a master
he is than himself faced with uncertainty
that can make or break him3.
guarantymany claim to teach
yet do not give guaranties
perhaps money back,
but not ultimate warrantyif a pagan sect were will to absorb its subjects individual will
then it wouldn’t be a sect any more,
it would be a religion by size.
but their subjects would all be healthy and human immortals.
it is easy to check.
are they?
heaven immortal is not exactly the same, isn’t it.4.
individual’s manifestations of sicknessthey are backed by the full life force of the individual incarnation
control it in a place,
and you get secondary manifestation of same force elsewhere.
easy to get lost in.
hence it is a matter of centering, grounding of space
but there is morefor such an act
‘heals’ through changing the world
by a change
and it is magic pure5.
innuendoa subject differs from a master
that when a subject is challenged
he defers to his master as his lightening rodbut master is not vague
but he can fish
and wine and dine and dance in hall6.
‘sexual practice … wil kill you’: if sexual practice does not cause cancer, how can it kill if is not the cause of cancer
‘if anyone remembered’: assumption of loss of record is interesting and unsupported, but negative facts cannot be proven, right
‘you should’: a entity believes so and all other entities should do or tolerate someting, a real truism
‘something’: true truism, if one assumes that that something varies-if not than this is again framing7.
‘not in healing tao’
well, ht is the open gate school of this verse.
how can a close gate challeng an open school in debate
when the definition of closed door is that one must submit his self to the school to enter the gate.8.
this writing assumes that a K. entity is not a master.
as such it would be feeding its school if one were to ‘argue’ a point with a closed door school.
this is only a public analysis of a common frame of mind.
that it is common should not be a surprise for there is also existing belief
that masses are not free.
but that is another matterJune 6, 2009 at 2:12 am #31491Energetically, cancer is repressed anger and frustration.
Given your description of her, it sounds like she
has several reasons for having it, as well.I’d encourage her to do whatever she needs to do,
to be able to release and resolve her repressed anger.Cancer is merely a physical manifestation of the
internal blockage initiated by the wood element
that is prevented from expressing itself.Of course, anything that helps improve qi flow,
is a good thing.You can suggest the breast massage, that you already
suggested. You can also suggest that she stop wearing
a bra. Bras inhibit lymphatic flow in and out of the breast.
Michael has made several posts about that. All of these
things can help.To get to the source, however, she needs to address
and resolve her repressed anger.S
June 6, 2009 at 9:11 am #31493Angry about being a victim? This relates a little to the post above about women not being happy.
June 6, 2009 at 4:31 pm #31495I meant in reference to her being frustrated
that she can’t express her sexuality as much as
she’d prefer to, because her lover is kept at a distance.This, plus possibly other unspecified reasons.
June 6, 2009 at 11:48 pm #31497Pietro,
Usually one speaks of a “benign tumor”, which is not really cancer in the normal sense of speaking. So I think you need to clarify her diagnosis before commencing any therapy.If it is just a tumor, breast massage would be a good therapy, and increasing sexual energy flow would be recommended. If she has had a biopsy confirming that it is cancer, then it is probably not benign since biopsy spread it.
As for Kathy Li’s post above about Joyce, it is rather silly since she knows next to nothing about what treatments Joyce employed and in what sequence, or to what degree the illness was karmic rather than physical, or what energetic practices Joyce was employing.
It appears to be a case of using a false crutch to promote longmen pai. But since most of the longmen pai followers are celibate, they are the very last people I would go to for treatment of a sexually based condition.
michael
June 8, 2009 at 11:43 am #31499Who is restricting her and does she feel victimized by this repressive force.
June 8, 2009 at 1:15 pm #31501Well it was not cancer!
And then there not need ot be a represed anger, which is a basic understuning of cancer. Repressed anger atack yourself instead of being expressed or resolved.
But the issue wasn’t cancer and it looks like PieatroS has the situation under control. I’m happy it wasn’t and that the breast massage wasn’t used for that kind of serious illness.
S D
June 9, 2009 at 4:55 pm #31503I agree the cancer is not supressing her Sexual expression.
June 11, 2009 at 2:51 pm #31505Paolina,
you have my e-mail address, use it for something other then sending me pictures of you getting fisted, and tell me when you will be on the Eastcoast. I will go to D.C., Philly, NYC, doesn’t have to be B-More. I would gladly meet you anywhere. I will find a nuetral place that will allow us to settle things in person without any interuptions. It would be my pleasure. Of course you won’t do it though, you are a coward. My homies asked for you all over that gym and no one had ever heard of you, so unless you are sniffing jockstraps in the locker room most the time you are simply lying about training there. Either that or you are so unexceptional that no one pays you any attention. Not even the front desk people had heard of you and I imagine you have to pass by them everytime you would come in to train.
I have never hidden from you I am easy to find I have done everything to try to fascilitate a face to face meeting with you except give you my home address, and you have done nothing except lie about who you are and where I can find you. Again if you are serious about meeting me then use the e-mail addy for something other then displaying your vast collection of gay porn and we will meet as soon as I am available. The more you threaten on the site and avoid me in real life the more you show yourself to be a coward. So again either put up or shut up.
P.S. my homies did not seek to hurt you just to confirm where I could find you. I kinda knew you were full of shit and didn’t want to waste a trip to hollywood on a cowards word.
June 15, 2009 at 12:03 pm #31507Steven,
Good post. Though I agree with what you said I do think that a lot of cancers are a result of enviromental toxins and sometimes have nothing to do with a persons emotions or repressed desires. For instance my father has aspestosis and his doctors say that it may eventually turn into cancer. I find it hard to believe that his repressed grief would create the cancer. I would blame it more on the aspestos that he inhaled while working in steel mills. I also find it hard to believe that cancer pockets can be blamed on a whole communities repressed feeling and desires, rather I would look more toward environmental factors that the whole communtiy shared in, such as waste dumping, water contamination, or heavy metals in the air. I think that if we start blaming the person solely for their condition we walk a dangerous path; one a kin to the middle ages where people who got sick were said to be sinners and deserving of their illness. Though again I agree with you that some cancers can be caused by stress and emotional imbalances I think the rise in cancer world wide must be looked at more as outside pathogentic factors rather than internal factors. Otherwise cancer at the level it’s at now would of been the same throughout history.It seems to me that modern people like to delude themselves about how high our stress level is. I mean historically modern people in industrialized countries live a fairly stress free life when compared to people of the past. We rarely have to worry about our city being raided and everyone hacked to peices. We haven’t felt famine or drought in my life time, which would of been a constant factor in the past. We don’t have to worry about enslavement or mutilation due to our race or status. We don’t have a controlling theocracy that forces people under penalty of law to repress our sexuality or desires. Basically we have it much easier and with many more freedoms then any other culture that has ever been. So my point is I can’t believe that stress and repression are the main causes of cancer today. I agree that it is good to work on repressed desires and stresses, especially if you are facing death, but I refuse to beleive that those are the main causes of the rise in cancer world wide. I am more prone to look at environmental factors, as we are putting things into the earth, air, water, and food that have never been there before. I think that if we are going to control, cure, and understand cancer we have to look more at environmental factors and the synergy that occurs within the body exposed to those factors.
Again good post, I just wanted to add my 2 cents. Though I am not claming that your post did this, but I sometimes cringe at New Age/Spiritual communities mistrust of science, to me it is a kin to fundamental christians banning the theory of evolution, or scientologists refusing to believe in autism, it’s often backwards and superstitious. Though I am warey of doctors as I have seen how inept and uncaring they can be, and how their policies towards insurance and people without money can lead to peoples death, I do not think that means that science and medicine are bad and that we should completely turn our backs to them, that is just a move back into superstition and folklore. Instead I think we need a reworking of our healthcare policies and a merging of traditional and modern medical techniques so that prevention is the main path and more modern therapies are employed as preventative factors fail. To move backwards is a waste of time, and those that claim that modern medicine hasn’t done anthing for us need to go look at polio and small pocks statistics from the past. I don’t think that meditation and qi-gung stopped the spread of those diseases but modern science, that being said I doubt that meditation and qi-gung will lead to the cure of cancer, maybe for the prevention of, or used in conjuction with modern techniques to quicken the recovery, but not the cure, not on a world wide basis.
just my 2 cents.
Peace & Tao
ShenchiJune 15, 2009 at 4:34 pm #31509Hi Shenchi,
>>>Though I agree with what you said I do think
>>>that a lot of cancers are a result of enviromental
>>>toxins and sometimes have nothing to do with a
>>>persons emotions or repressed desires. For instance
>>>my father has aspestosis and his doctors say that
>>>it may eventually turn into cancer. I find it hard
>>>to believe that his repressed grief would create
>>>the cancer. I would blame it more on the aspestos
>>>that he inhaled while working in steel mills.First of all, the body’s natural state is health. Due
to biological mechanisms geared toward survival, the human
body is incredibly efficient at healing itself. Modern
medicine doesn’t heal you; *you* heal you. No doctor can
heal you; no drug can heal you; only *you* can heal you.
All a doctor or a drug can do is help give your body the
support it needs so that it can heal itself. Even something
acute like a wound–a doctor or cream doesn’t make the wound
disappear; it heals on its own, through time, by the body’s
self-repairing operations.You can say that “environment toxins” trigger cancer, but
what is the organ of the body whose job it is to remove
toxins from the body? The liver.The liver can not do its job, if it is rigidity constricted
say by the negative emotion that affects it the most; namely
anger and frustration.Why did the doctor say your father “may” get cancer?
Because it is possible that your father may not!!
It’s very well possible that his body may be able to detoxify
the poisons and not have cancer develop.Clearly, if there were no toxins, then there would be nothing
that were needed as far as detoxification. However the trigger
for cancer is the inability to detoxify . . . the disability of the
liver from doing the job it is *designed* for. So yes, it is
the repressed anger preventing the liver from doing what it does
normally.That doesn’t mean that if a person gets sick or progressively more
and more ill, that it is the person’s “fault”. That’s the
blame game, and is about casting judgement. Everyone is a human
being with a complex interplay of feelings and emotions. It is
HUMAN to have to them. To have otherwise, would be akin to being
a robot. Everyone buries emotional crap; it’s who we are. It’s
not the feelings/emotions/crap that’s the problem; it’s the lack
of skill in dealing with it. If someone’s “crap” puts them
into a state of “dis-ease”, then it’s not their “fault” they
haven’t dealt with it–that’s an arrogant judgement, rather a person
should have compassion and sympathy for the person for the
traumas–spoken and unspoken–that they’ve had to endure and
have been unsuccessful in dealing with. So the response should not
be judgement, but rather loving-kindness to the person and their
situation.>>>It seems to me that modern people like to delude
>>>themselves about how high our stress level is.
>>>I mean historically modern people in industrialized
>>>countries live a fairly stress free life when compared
>>>to people of the past. We rarely have to worry about
>>>our city being raided and everyone hacked to peices.
>>>We haven’t felt famine or drought in my life time,
>>>which would of been a constant factor in the past.
>>>We don’t have to worry about enslavement or mutilation
>>>due to our race or status. We don’t have a controlling
>>>theocracy that forces people under penalty of law to
>>>repress our sexuality or desires. Basically we have it
>>>much easier and with many more freedoms then any other
>>>culture that has ever been.I respectfully disagree.
More and more of a person’s day is being consumed by
doing “work”. In hunter-gatherer times, people did
back-breaking hard labor, but it didn’t occupy as many
hours in a week as the modern person. Today working
60-80 hours a week is common. Why? Because of this
sick consumer-driven society. People bust their asses
working all the time, so that they can get money, to then
buy food AND CRAP WE DON’T ACTUALLY NEED BUT ARE FOOLED INTO
THINKING WE DO, just so that we have the tools and skills to
work even more. It is a sick cycle, whereby we lose ourselves
in the process. It’s a way of burying unhappiness, and not
actually being able to connect with who we are.Simple people who live a simple life, i.e.
hermits, the Amish, other simple villagers, work physically
hard, but they don’t spend as much time per day working, and
they certainly don’t spend as much time worrying about nonsense.
Sure shit happens to them, and it sucks–things we don’t
experience, but they don’t live in fear of it until it occurs, and
their lives are much more stress-free. Talk to someone who
lives such a simple life and you will understand very rapidly how
much more grateful they are to NOT LIVE A MODERN LIFE.And don’t say “we have it much easier”. *You* may have it easier,
but don’t tell that to the single mom working two shitty minimum-wage
jobs at 60+ hours per week just to feed her children. There is
a wide spectrum of people in this country (and elsewhere), and some
of them have it pretty damn rough.>>>Though I am not claming that your post did this,
>>>but I sometimes cringe at New Age/Spiritual communities
>>>mistrust of science, to me it is a kin to fundamental
>>>christians banning the theory of evolution, or
>>>scientologists refusing to believe in autism,
>>>it’s often backwards and superstitious.
(some clipped)
>>>To move backwards is a waste of time, and those
>>>that claim that modern medicine hasn’t done anthing
>>>for us need to go look at polio and small pocks
>>>statistics from the past. I don’t think that meditation
>>>and qi-gung stopped the spread of those diseases
(some clipped)I don’t think anybody is suggesting to “ignore” modern medicine.
Having said that though, an ounce of prevention is worth a
pound of cure. It is much easier to prevent illness than
to get rid of it.Moreover, as far as cancer goes, modern medicine’s record at
solving the problem is piss-poor. There are basically three
techniques that oncologists use. One, cut it out. Two,
use radiation. Three, use chemo.Cutting it out, while removing the tumor, ignores the rest
of the person as if that’s the only area that is diseased.
In addition, cutting and biopsy-ing often help spread the
cancer.The other two methods, while they have some marginal and/or
debatable successes–end up poisoning and toxifying the body
even further, which compounds the problem and often leads
to relapses–that is of course assuming the person even
survives this toxifying “treatment”. Hmm. We poison our
lakes, water supply, air, etc. creating toxic bodies; we
create the mentality of doing work for the sole purpose of
acquiring consumer objects with no significant meaning,
toxifying our spirit. So why not solve our cancer problem
by adding even more toxins. Sounds logical to me.No. I think I’ll stick to my original beliefs here, LOL.
Smiles to you,
StevenJune 15, 2009 at 8:11 pm #31511Steven,
again great post. There’s far too much to rebut at the moment but I would like to hit on a few things. As far as the Aspestosis in my Fathers lungs and why Aspestos is hard to rid the body of is due, not so much to the liver but, to the shape of the aspestos fiber itself. It is hooked or barb shaped. It works its way in and then like a fish hook it fixes itself in place. I don’t think that work on the liver is goining to remove those barbs that are hooked into the flesh of the lungs. The main reason that the doctors said he “may” get cancer is due to the way that the aspestos makes x-rays of the lungs near impossible so it’s hard to say for sure what’s going on in there. Also it is hard to say how much of it he was exposed to over the years. I think if you took Lao Tzu himself and exposed him to enough aspestos he would end up getting cancer. I do however believe (and I said this in my previous post) that liver work would help prevent the on set of it for some time and I think that it would also help in the recovery from the cancer. I also completely believe in the healing capabilities of the human body, but we often need help in facilitating that process. Whether that be from accupuncture, herbs, massage, energy work, or prescription drugs.
I also totally agree with you that what we have to use in fighting cancer at the present moment is barbaric and along the lines of blood letting, but I also work in a hospital (though not in the medical field) and I see first hand people coming into the hospital looking like corpses and over time they look better and better. I talk to them on a daily basis; as the hospital I work in has a well known oncology department with a very good success rate. People come from all over the world to go to this hospital. I hear from them and their family members how thankful they are for the treatment they got and how it saved their lives. I also know that it can be a hard long road for these people but more people survive then don’t. It is just certain cancers are way more deadly and are harder to reduce. Actually the trend in medicine right now is to include things like accupuncture and massage along with the more invasive therapies. Hopefully the future will hold much less invasive, and far more inclusive, and preventative therapies.
Again I don’t herald western medicine as the end all be all nor do I accept that eastern medicine can cure all that ails ya. I think that a combination of both, with the western side beng a last resort, is the best we can get right now. Would I go and immediately start kemo if I found out that I had cancer, no I would do what most on this board would do I would attempt to do my best at healing it myself. Would I refuse to go to the hospital and go through western procedures if it seemed I had no choice, Hell No! I would go and attempt to use what was available and if I survived I would work on recovering from it in the most natural way I could.
My main point is that I don’t think that cancers, proven to be caused by external pathogenic factors, can be ignored or reduced to internal emotional causes.
Now as far as stress today, I would gladly take the post modern stresses of today then that of the tribal, or classical society. No police force, life expectancy of 30, poor diet, unless you were part of the 1% nobalatis. In Rome 80% of all citizens were slaves. They were beaten on a regular basis, often fed quite poorly, and were used a sexual play things. In ancient China, for the most part, things weren’t much better. Constant wars, no police force, street justice, famine, nobles who constantly abused the lower class. And I don’t mean abused like low income, poor education, I mean abused like mutilate your face for looking at them the wrong way, or lopping off your head because you bowed with contempt. Not even to mention the unbeleivably high rate of infant mortality that existed prior to industrilization. Of course America is high in it’s infant mortality but it used to be 1 in 3 of all children died. That’s even with the nobility. I don’t think most people really understand exactly what life was like in the past. From my Anthropolgy studies though I can say I would not trade my place in the Idustrialized world for one in the third world, not to mention a second world. Most people in those parts of the world face the real possibility of losing family members, or even dying themselves, on an almost daily basis. That to me is real stress. I grew up pretty poor by American standards and my father grew up incredibly poor. I know from my own experiences and the stories of my father that most people have no clue what real stress is. Worrying if I can pay my rent or car insurance is nothing to having to go through winter with one pair of shoes to share between two siblings, as my father had to do, and many people all over the world have similar situations. That is real stress. My father was an exception in America and for most industrilized countries, but that is the norm for third world countries, and I refuse to believe that we have it worse than them. If you have a roof over your head and food in your cupboard, and you always have, then you probably don’t know what real stress is.
Again Steven great post. I have always enjoyed reading what you have to say, and I really do agree with you for the most part. I just think that there’s more to cancer than repressed emotions, though I do think they play a part just not all the time. I look forward to reading more from you and maybe seeing you this summer at heavenly mountain. Until then,
Peace & Tao
Shenchi
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.