- This topic has 58 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 3 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Hi,
You asked how sages knew how planet qi feels like if they couldn’t even see planets. I gave you an answer for that. Not more, not less. It’s not my fault that you are not open to prajna wisdom; otherwise, my answer would have left your ego satisfied.
Fajin
I misunderstood your *off topic*, my apology for my reaction Pero, couldnt respond earlier because of travelling and no access to computer.
well it looks like one week later there is still no answer..
I was planning to abandon the forum altogether but your question and the forum response is irrisistable
this forum has, over the course of a month and a half or so proven to be a TOTAL disappointment..
new age fluff garbage in my opinion..
don’t know what to tell you?
i have not done greatest kan and li yet and your question makes total sense.. the responses are as vapid and inane as anything I have seen over several months..
the only thing interesting to come from here are Winn’s posts, and I am surprised to see no response?
your question is clear (I have done greater kan and li)
What are these planets supposed to feel like and what differentiates their channeling from any other “sphere” of an element..
also you are asking how anyone would know the shape of the planet or it’s tones to begin with
and why Venus would be totally opposite here from western astrological or Indian astrological systems..
I, for one, agree with you that I highly doubt the reality of the elements as such (metal chi in the air etc) and even further doubt any directional correlation..
I DO however think that the human pineal gland my be able to tune into planetary magnetic fields and these practices are elementary exercises in doing such with their simplistic color scales and tones..
How can you possibly tune into a planet when you don’t know it’s shape, don’t anything that differentiates it from any other sphere of an element, and are not even sensing in it’s true physical direction?
from what you are saying the cd never tells you to use a TRUE astronomical chart
if the point is reosnating with M.Winn (?) then are people supposed to sponataneously have visions of said planet and feel all it’s tones and energies?
if so, how come they can’t describe any of it to you in these reponses?
sounds like they have magazine pictures in their minds and that’s about it…
I just do not understand how you can get anywhere with a planet that you are not really focusing on..
for instance, everytime I actually visualize the planet (conjured up from memory of an image I’ve seen) it’s always spinning much faster, like a globe you spin yourself..
but I have photographic memory
why would it possibly spin that fast? I coooombine it with the element but
Venus seems to feel much better as warm and moist not cool and dry
and I think this is all WAY to much of a stretch to begin with
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.