Home › Forum Online Discussion › Philosophy › Question for Michael and others, too on THOUGHTS………….
- This topic has 60 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 4 months ago by TrueSelf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 8, 2006 at 11:21 am #16188August 8, 2006 at 11:26 am #16190
Hi Nnonnth,
I notice you mention the illusionary world that Buddhists refer to and perhaps you have misconceptions about it. My view is that the universe is a hologram with light and sound frequencies projecting the picture.
The void, or as quantum science calls it zero point, or empty space matter is the only thing that is permanent, ie. it does not depend on anything else for its existence. It is omnipresent, infinite, beyond time, etc. It is Wu Ji, the primordial isness.
Quantum science says that void permeates 99.9999999…% of the universe. Just the tiniest possible fraction is a field of vibrating light and sound. Your eyes do not perceive the void, but only the hologram. That’s why it is an illusion.
Smiles,
FajinAugust 8, 2006 at 11:49 am #16192– listen don’t worry ok, this thread has convinced me that Zennists are not on a head trip like kundalini guys and some magicians are. So we agree.
I just say this: when something is very small, it does not mean it is an illusion! If there is only a tiny percentage of the universe that has physical manifestation so what? There still is, and because we are here, it still matters! – and it is still ‘real’.
The illusion is that ‘this is all there is’, not that ‘this exists’. It certainly does exist and for very good reasons. See?
NN
August 8, 2006 at 12:04 pm #16194You said things well and I agree with it. Glad that you don’t have any misconceptions. Post more questions if you have any.
Smiles,
FajinAugust 8, 2006 at 12:16 pm #16196I just meant tot hrow that article in there for Dog because I just wanted to show that alchemy does occur for Buddhists. I could have chose a different peice from the internet, but I think that due to that article a nice thread opened up and we all got something out of it, wouldn’t you say. 🙂
Fajin
August 8, 2006 at 12:25 pm #16198My Martail arts teacher is a zen buddhist. I was curious your thoughts on it. I have found that the zen buddhist I train with to work with and learn from the elements. The belt colors take on knew meanings. Not so much a rank as much as a element you are working with. In the end there is no element, yet all the elements are there, there is no form, yet all the forms are there. You can now flow naturaly.
August 8, 2006 at 1:36 pm #16200Hi NN:
I think you miss my point.
I was talking to Faj about communicating with people into alchemy, not alchemical proccess. In my experience when talking about life alchemists they spit things into pieces, and they are limited and restricted by these pieces or steps. THese steps and “processes” are not rigid, the entire proces can occur at anytime.
But my point was if you talk from a Chan experience perspective with an alchemist, the alchemist will isolate and dissect the words to fit their step by step method and compare and contrast to the point of jus trying to distuinguish themselves from others.
And the alchemists just make a statement not rooted in truth and run with it to separate themsleves from other systems.
Below I comment on each of your questions.
I simply don’t understand! It isn’t the alchemists who polarize towards the multiple, but the life force itself, Tao itself, the Primordial itself… the 10,000 things are not unnecessary distinctions, they are necessary disctintions! We all have left and right sides, we have organs in certain patterns… The fact that we have twos and fives inside us indicates the fundamental nature, not only of the one from which we descend, but of the way that one divides into many, which is equally natural and necessary. It reminds me that Isis had to unite the scattered fragments of Osiris long enough to make love to him, in order that Horus be born (sorry to bring in Egyptiana, but they’re doing it on the ‘General’ page anyhow…) That legend is precisely similar to the alchemical process of the HT as I now see.
**************************************************8
Im saying some alchemists, in their communication with people are very polarizing, they are looking only for differences with others, not the common ground. This has nothing to do with nature, but how people talk.This is why I say it is puzzling to me. It seems obvious to me that life is not an illusion, obvious that there is health and sickness in the body, and obvious that balance is important. There is no disconnection between yin yang and yuan (or Mem Shin and Aleph for the kabbalistically inclined). It is all one great meaning.
**********************************
Illusion usually refers to people’s own wants and desires to have things the way they want, not they way things are. Wanting physical immortality, as the old chinese wanted was an illusion and these illusions create a way to view and live life that takes one away from living in their yuan nature.So alchemists don’t ‘play with the separation’, Tao does! In the correcting/shaping/harmonizing that you are talking about the body and life are healed. Is this insignificant? Only if one believes physical life is also insignificant!
*****************************8
I think I explained this above.Maybe the reason I prefer Taoism is that it keeps contact with shamanic roots and pagan roots. Then again so does Hinduism, so what do I know? Perhaps I’m just playing semantics here. But I don’t think so!
******************************888
Lots of tao shamanism is not so positive, people tend to choose what they want. In a way the White Cloud method filters out lots of shaman stuff.regards,
bagua
August 8, 2006 at 2:38 pm #16202Hi Bagua,
When you said:
>>But my point was if you talk from a Chan experience perspective with an alchemist, the alchemist will isolate and dissect the words to fit their step by step method and compare and contrast to the point of jus trying to distuinguish themselves from others.
And the alchemists just make a statement not rooted in truth and run with it to separate themsleves from other systems.<<
*I think that this personality fit me when I was discussing you in all those rounds. I just want to apologize if I gave you a tough time discussing with me all those times. You were being very patient with me, you are wiser and more experienced than I, so I hope we can meet one day and practice together and share our knowledge and wisdom.
I'm off to get some sleep and practice Tai Ji in the morning, good luck!
Oh, and I like what you said to Nnonnth about illusion to the self, GENJOKOAN!
Smiles,
FajinAugust 8, 2006 at 4:29 pm #16204Hey Bagua –
>>I was talking to Faj about communicating with people into alchemy, not alchemical proccess<>Illusion usually refers to people’s own wants and desires to have things the way they want, not they way things are.<>Lots of tao shamanism is not so positive, people tend to choose what they want. In a way the White Cloud method filters out lots of shaman stuff.<<
Well I know what you mean! But I only said it kept in contact with those roots. There is a definite split – following Narby – between old and new religion in terms of the reflexive value accorded the ordinary human life.
NN
August 8, 2006 at 6:25 pm #16206>>Illusion usually refers to people’s own wants and desires to have things the way they want, not the way things are.<<
Hmm… rather different from Fajin's definition!
*When we grasp the hologram, we stop seeing the void. It's only an illusion for those who can't find the stillness within the movement.
August 8, 2006 at 6:28 pm #16208“I just meant tot hrow that article in there for Dog because I just wanted to show that alchemy does occur for Buddhists.”
Anyone one who knows what to ask for and can make space for the change. There are alot of ammazing things that can happen in ones life if you have a relationship with the life force. What is proper relationship? What is your role? The life force holds all potential but we make the chooses. There are aspects to this discussion that are hard to understand sence we learn in a linear fashion. Now that we are not linear but that we choose to us it as a tool. We live in a linear world to help with the process. We make color pearls to help with the process. Our pets are great helpers giving us love teaching us of acceptance. There is so much here to help us. I am not preaching, I am shure alot know this already just making my world know.
August 8, 2006 at 6:48 pm #16210“yuan to neutrality, ie. the line in the Tai Ji. That is Wu Ji, not yuan.”
I am glad you found the wuji, I lost it about four days from now.
“we attempt to return to our primordial nature”
Do you consider wuji our primardial nature?
“Zen is about keeping up with consistency”
??
August 8, 2006 at 11:42 pm #16212Hi:
“Hmm… rather different from Fajin’s definition! And furthermore exactly the definition I have given on my own account, a good four or five times already – that this physical world *is not* an illusion but can be the *cause* of illusion in the human mind.”
****************************************
I think another way to say this is we have a choice how we experience life. Illusion is just a word to express there are other ways to experience life, the long history of cultivators reveals a common awareness shared, this for the sake of our discussion is the state we cultivate, other extreme states take us from this and we call it illusion.bagua
August 9, 2006 at 6:24 am #16214>>I am not preaching<<
You sound like you're cool, kind, aware and on the right track. NN
August 9, 2006 at 7:30 pm #16216Well, Michael, you have not given your answer yet!
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.