- This topic has 18 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 7 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Pietro’s account is excellent to study
Wendy’s is more difficultit seems he is sensitive
well resistance is persistance1.
the apperture
the contactsomething happens
the ‘whoosh’ (the A) (he verbalized it as ‘provacation’)
the ‘doubt’ (the B)two meanings happens
each with emotional and mental and other components2.
All rotes are real.anything that exists to us begins so by getting meaning
when rotes from contact penetrate our layers meanings happen3.
As nlp say, each communication has an intended action (internalized or acted out) of recepient. An intended shape of rote. Yet personal field of receiver gives it its final shaping.Some rotes are effective transmissions. When our personal field was balanced enough to absorb the contact without stress.
Other rotes are ineffective transmissions. When our personal field uses such contact to manifest our latent imabalance. In such case our personal field did not absord contact without stressing and restimulating our issues and is beginning of theraphy.
Such acts are AOL (the autonomous over-lay) from RV view. Other RV are getting points that have not yet been prompted, but that is the obsession of CRV, the controlled remote viewing.
4.
there are four possibilities analysis of rotes:
1. the A is ‘data’ and the B is ‘data’
2. the A is ‘data’, but the B is ‘AOL’
3. the A is ‘AOL’, but the B is ‘data’
4. the A is ‘AOL’ and the B is ‘AOL’As it is seen, it is improper to automatically consider ‘doubt’ as correct and ‘Whoosh’ as incorrect.
Actually, without experience it is more proper to consider it as AOL, while
‘whoosh’ as correct.
Each one can be further probed individually before final assesment.Pietro asked Wnedy ‘are you provoking me’ because he was doubting his intuition.
well..There were no grounds to doubt provocation part so that part should be checked by open question.
There are grounds to doubt the doubt in intuition so it is ok to chech it with suggestive question.
Pietro should thus ask ‘do you want me to doubt myself’ and trust the provocation if he wanted to be cheeky.
Or say ‘i sensed provocation and doubt, did you mean that?’
or to stay most open ‘what was the intent, thoughts and emotions of your message’ and then pose more specific questiona good habit
I told you before jernej, we come from different starsystems. I have no single clue what you are talking about. If you said it was Mongolian I would believe you. I can’t read your English (I admit my knowledgde of English is not so wide) but I can’t contact the vibes between the lines. You are completely alien to me. Although I met some strange vibes through the years, yours is not accessible from my point of being.
It seems that you try to tell something but I only read: ‘*¨_0ùµ:,oiµ:’.
Simple English is okay with me.I do speak directly.
But for you to make it your intelligence
if the I makes all the connections for the You
than it is just a entertainment, like movieLike Dirk Ollibright said
‘you have to watch the video a lot or practice the form a lot’
a lot
that is most important
it demands energy to make it your ownif I wrote all down it would take a lot
what i write is born in dreams and connects to months of contemplation
to make posts so long to enable the full transferr in the time of reading is
so I write the keys
you connect and integrate themand the way you integrate them is the response
your responseexample:
read
rvmanual (firedocs.com)
irva.com recommended reading (warcollier, macmoneagle, swann, buchannan, other reports)
swann essays (biomindsuperpowers.com)
matrix5 (the rotes explaination)
trv sets (psi-tech.com)the essay makes the jist
you say what made you an issue
and i respond
you say blank
and i say ok.Bagua is very skilled. What i wrote was to challange him.
It was written for him as he is. He has not integrated it thus has not changed. So the message remains the same as it was written in full and in good faith.
Etiquette is the way of intelligent savages.I still say bagua should teach talisman magic. He has the skill.
Study him. Perhaps even make him a offer he can’t refuse and he will speak.
The tittle is a tease.I think that Jernej prefers to be cryptic and obscure.
It is possible that there may be some meaning in the things he says.
As a native english speaker I must say that it is through no limitation in your English that you arrive at an inability to discern what Jernej is trying to say.
He seems to be emitting fragments of whole ideas through the lens of a different native tongue and perhaps a poetic inclination.
Or he just might be completely bonkers. No offense Jernej, sometimes I enjoy your posts, but usually I really don’t know what you are saying, or only 5% or 10% of it makes any sense at all.
By the way Wendy, your post was really one of the most funny I have read in months!
Really. I don’t know if you intended that, but thanks for the laugh.Smiles
Craig
Craig>>Or he just might be completely bonkers. No offense Jernej, sometimes I enjoy your posts, but usually I really don’t know what you are saying, or only 5% or 10% of it makes any sense at all.<<
LOL me too. I love trying to de-code them, but I almost always haven't got a clue what they're about
>>I do speak directly.<>But for you to make it your intelligence
if the I makes all the connections for the You
than it is just a entertainment, like movie<>Like Dirk Ollibright said
‘you have to watch the video a lot or practice the form a lot’
a lot
that is most important
it demands energy to make it your own<>if I wrote all down it would take a lot
what i write is born in dreams and connects to months of contemplation
to make posts so long to enable the full transferr in the time of reading is
so I write the keys
you connect and integrate them<>and the way you integrate them is the response
your responseexample:
read
rvmanual (firedocs.com)
irva.com recommended reading (warcollier, macmoneagle, swann, buchannan, other reports)
swann essays (biomindsuperpowers.com)
matrix5 (the rotes explaination)
trv sets (psi-tech.com)<>the essay makes the jist
you say what made you an issue
and i respond
you say blank
and i say ok.<>Bagua is very skilled. What i wrote was to challange him.
It was written for him as he is. He has not integrated it thus has not changed. So the message remains the same as it was written in full and in good faith.
Etiquette is the way of intelligent savages.<>I still say bagua should teach talisman magic. He has the skill.
Study him. Perhaps even make him a offer he can’t refuse and he will speak.
The tittle is a tease.<<*Nothing difficult to understand. Bagua is a skilled man and would do well teaching talisman magic.
The link regards to the previous post with you and Wendy about relationships. Jernej put it in for you to understand what he was directing you when he said that you are sensitive and Wendy was difficult, etc. – his first post.
Hope that makes the movie clearer and easier to understand!
FajinWoman riding on a bull
in order to still offer
English but won’t deliver what
the eagle speaks
to those in service
even all the roads seem to meet his destination.
Who then is the eagle and who the raven after all,
Pietro is training today!
Why weave a cloth no one can ever wear?shabd
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.