the misnomer of retention

it seems it common to have something passed down via a key
where the means of transporting the meaning was
changing the cause and effect
using prevailing hard discs.

e.g. the lotus
it is a master practice.
but can one really do it.
there is a easy test.
stand up
on one foot, lift other foot
and rotate that other foot
so that it reaches the position that it would have were one in a lotus.
can’t do it: then what do you think you are practising when going further and
hurting knee or ankle.

similarly.
there is no retention as a practise
if it is, it is a stagnation
when put down to physical it means cutting down ones penis erection
a mutilation.

(well there is case for ‘mutilation’ like breaking hymen in vagine (and some say tongue), but such are done to enhance the organ function and not retard it)

retention as a euphemism just means one is developing other channels
where things are happening
while a jerk-off has a smaller range of life expression.

and what about the breeder channel of ejaculation.
well there is heaven, earth and human ejaculation.
cutting the human release is like cutting the heaven one: it is retarding
unless it is not a cut.
again a reversal of cause and effect.

and what could woman feel.
she might just wellcome new meat.
but what
no contraception
she might just blow you off.