- This topic has 56 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Through experience of being faced daily with imbalances, and having the choice to actively balance them or passivley let them be.
So imbalances do not exist? What about your concept of karma and emotional attachment, is that not an imbalance in your cosmology?
>>”If you look at it from a single point of you, it’s polarized, but if you take all of it as a mass, it’s in harmony.”
I look at it as both, and deal with it on both levels.
>>I look at it as both, and deal with it on both levels.<<
*Totally agree. The view and the viewer are one.
>>”the view and the viewer are one”
Ultimately interconnected, yes, but in the sense of free will, no.
I harmonize the microcosm to harmonize with the macrocosm, but for practical purposes the microcosm is not the same as the macrocosm though they are obviously connected.
>>but in the sense of free will, no<<
*There is no view without a viewer. There is no viewer without a view. Free will depends on the action of the viewer. How you choose to act on the view, determines the level of free will. If you choose to only view, it is not the real non-action. One attains non-action by action. I also harmonize the microcosm.
True that everything is interconnected and interdependent. My point is that there is a difference between being merged into the collective mind with no individuality, and being merged while maintaining an individual sense of free will.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.